Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
  • Face book
  • Instagram
PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE

Beyond the Brief

PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE

Beyond the Brief

  • Home
  • Supreme Court Today
  • High Courts Today
  • Judiciary Mock-Test
  • Editor Coloumn

About This Site

This may be a good place to introduce yourself and your site or include some credits.

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Steps Up Action Against Digital Arrest Scams
  • Supreme Court Directs No Punitive Action Against Law Student After Rs. 5 Lakh BNSS Notice Withdrawn
  • Supreme Court Refuses to Stay UPI MDR Above ₹2,000, Seeks Explanation from Centre
  • Supreme Court Asks West Bengal Speaker to Decide MLA Disqualification Pleas by October 8
  • Tripura High Court Directs Speedy Conclusion of Vicky Murder Trial

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Find Us

Address
123 Main Street
New York, NY 10001

Hours
Monday–Friday: 9:00AM–5:00PM
Saturday & Sunday: 11:00AM–3:00PM

  • Home
  • Supreme Court Today
  • High Courts Today
  • Judiciary Mock-Test
  • Editor Coloumn
Subscribe
Close

Search

hcs today

Tripura High Court Directs Tripura Government to Fill 1,116 Vacant PG Teacher Posts

September 11, 2026 4 Min Read
0

Agartala, September 11, 2026: The Tripura High Court has directed the State Government to forthwith commence the recruitment process for 1,116 vacant Post-Graduate Teacher (PGT) posts, holding that teaching posts do not lapse merely because the incumbent retires, resigns, dies or is terminated from service.

The order was passed by a Division Bench comprising Chief Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice Biswajit Palit on September 9, 2026, in WP(C)(PIL) No. 04 of 2026, Court on its own motion v. The Union of India & Others. The proceedings arose from concerns regarding vacancies in teaching posts and the delay in recruitment in government schools across Tripura.

Court Questions Need to Re-create Existing Posts

The Court considered an additional affidavit filed by the Under Secretary, School Education Department, Government of Tripura. According to the affidavit, 1,116 PG Teacher posts in various subjects had fallen vacant due to death, retirement, resignation and termination of services, and the Department had initiated a process for re-creation of those posts.

The Division Bench questioned the necessity of such a process. The Court observed that it failed to understand how posts could lapse merely because the incumbent had retired, resigned, died or had been terminated. According to the Court, the exercise of re-creating such posts was wholly unnecessary, since the posts themselves do not cease to exist merely because the incumbent is no longer in service.

Consequently, the High Court directed the State Government to commence recruitment for all 1,116 vacant PG Teacher posts forthwith.

High Court Also Questions Delay in Filling Graduate Teacher Vacancies

The Court also considered the position regarding Graduate Teacher posts. The State informed the Court that a requisition had been made to the Teachers’ Recruitment Board, Tripura, on July 5, 2022, for recommendation of candidates against 230 Graduate Teacher vacancies, although 2,193 Graduate Teacher posts had fallen vacant due to retirement, resignation, death or termination.

The Bench questioned why only a small fraction of the total vacancies was being considered for recruitment. The Court observed that it was the duty of the respondents to fill all the vacant posts and not merely a small number of them.

The State had referred to a pending Special Leave Petition before the Supreme Court concerning the application of reservation rules to the 230 Graduate Teacher vacancies. The High Court, however, noted that there was no stay order from the Supreme Court restraining the filling up of those posts.

Recruitment Can Proceed Subject to Supreme Court Outcome

Considering the need for teachers in schools and the fact that the academic year had already substantially progressed, the High Court directed the State to take a decision by the next date of hearing regarding appointment to the Graduate Teacher posts.

The Court permitted the State to proceed subject to the result of the pending SLP, so that students do not suffer because of the continuing shortage of teachers.

700 Newly Created Graduate Teacher Posts Also Under Court’s Scrutiny

The High Court was further informed that the Department had created 700 new Graduate Teacher posts and had sent a requisition to the Teachers’ Recruitment Board, Tripura, on August 5, 2025.

Although the Teachers’ Recruitment Board had conducted the selection test on February 14, 2026, no further progress had taken place. Taking note of the delay, the Court impleaded the Chairman, Teachers’ Recruitment Board, Tripura, as a respondent in the PIL.

The Board was directed to complete the process of filling up the 700 Graduate Teacher posts at the earliest and submit an affidavit detailing the steps taken before the next date of hearing.

Directions Regarding Headmasters and Assistant Headmasters

The Court also addressed vacancies in supervisory positions in government schools. It noted that there were 162 vacant posts of Headmasters and 100 vacant posts of Assistant Headmasters in Higher Secondary Schools, apart from 304 vacant Headmaster posts in High Schools.

The respondents were directed to fill these vacancies in accordance with the applicable recruitment rules and place an affidavit before the Court explaining the action taken pursuant to the Court’s directions.

Matter Listed for September 21

The proceedings will continue before the High Court. The matter has been directed to be listed along with WP(C)(PIL) No. 09 of 2026 on September 21, 2026.

The order is significant because the High Court has taken a broad view of the State’s obligation to address long-standing vacancies in the school education system and has specifically directed recruitment against existing vacancies rather than allowing administrative delays relating to re-creation of posts to continue.

Case: Court on its own motion v. The Union of India & Others
Case No.: WP(C)(PIL) No. 04 of 2026
Order Date: September 9, 2026
Bench: Chief Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao and Justice Biswajit Palit

Author

chiefeditor

Follow Me
Other Articles
Previous

Retired Judge Cannot Claim Committee Remuneration Without Performing Work: Tripura High Court

Next

Tripura High Court Restores Employee’s Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witnesses in Disciplinary Inquiry

No Comment! Be the first one.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For more information

Stay updated with the latest legal news, judgments, and court developments. Follow us on social media for regular updates. Plead & Prejudice — Beyond the Brief.

Search

Contact Us

Have a legal news tip, query, or feedback? Email us or send us a DM on our social media platforms. We’d be happy to hear from you.

About This Site

Plead & Prejudice brings you concise and timely updates on Indian courts, judgments, and legal developments.

Beyond the Brief.

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Steps Up Action Against Digital Arrest Scams
  • Supreme Court Directs No Punitive Action Against Law Student After Rs. 5 Lakh BNSS Notice Withdrawn
  • Supreme Court Refuses to Stay UPI MDR Above ₹2,000, Seeks Explanation from Centre
  • Supreme Court Asks West Bengal Speaker to Decide MLA Disqualification Pleas by October 8
  • Tripura High Court Directs Speedy Conclusion of Vicky Murder Trial

Archives

  • September 2026 (25)
  • August 2026 (5)

Contact Us

chiefeditor@pleadandprejudice.com

Copyright 2026 — PLEAD & PREJUDICE. All rights reserved.