Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
  • Face book
  • Instagram
PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE

Beyond the Brief

PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE

Beyond the Brief

  • Home
  • Supreme Court Today
  • High Courts Today
  • Judiciary Mock-Test
  • AIBE Exam Mock Test
  • Editor Coloumn

About This Site

This may be a good place to introduce yourself and your site or include some credits.

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Stays Criminal Defamation Trial Against Rahul Gandhi Over Remarks Against PM Modi
  • Tripura HC Reverses Cheque Bounce Acquittal: Mere Doubt Over Lender’s Financial Capacity Cannot Save Accused
  • Section 43 vs Section 42 of NDPS Act: Tripura HC Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case
  • Tripura HC Case Raises Questions Over Non-Deposit of Employees’ EPF and ESI Contributions
  • Bengal Voters Move Supreme Court Against SIR After Names Deleted From Electoral Rolls

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Find Us

Address
123 Main Street
New York, NY 10001

Hours
Monday–Friday: 9:00AM–5:00PM
Saturday & Sunday: 11:00AM–3:00PM

  • Home
  • Supreme Court Today
  • High Courts Today
  • Judiciary Mock-Test
  • AIBE Exam Mock Test
  • Editor Coloumn
Subscribe
Close

Search

sc today

SC Declines to Interfere With Calcutta HC Bail Order for Congress Leader

October 8, 2026 1 Min Read
0

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to interfere with a Calcutta High Court order granting interim bail to Congress leader and Nandigram Assembly by-election candidate Milan Pradhan, a day after the polling.

A Bench comprising Chief Justice of India Justice Indu Surya Wala and Justice V. Mohana dismissed the State of West Bengal’s challenge to the High Court order.

The Supreme Court, however, clarified that it was not expressing any opinion on the merits of the criminal cases registered against Pradhan. The Bench observed that the State would be free to raise all its contentions before the appropriate court if it seeks an extension of the interim bail or its regularisation.

Solicitor-General Tushar Mehta, appearing for the State, submitted that Pradhan had to surrender on October 21.

The Supreme Court’s decision allows the interim bail granted by the Calcutta High Court to continue, while leaving the State free to pursue appropriate legal remedies before the concerned court.

Author

Plead and Prejudice Network

Follow Me
Other Articles
Previous

Tripura High Court: Korfa Cultivator’s Legal Heirs Cannot Claim Land Acquisition Compensation Without Proving Continued Cultivation

Next

SC to Examine Plea on CEC Appointment Law After Split Verdict

No Comment! Be the first one.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For more information

Stay updated with the latest legal news, judgments, and court developments. Follow us on social media for regular updates. Plead & Prejudice — Beyond the Brief.

Search

Contact Us

Have a legal news tip, query, or feedback? Email us or send us a DM on our social media platforms. We’d be happy to hear from you.

About This Site

Plead & Prejudice brings you concise and timely updates on Indian courts, judgments, and legal developments.

Beyond the Brief.

Recent Posts

  • Supreme Court Stays Criminal Defamation Trial Against Rahul Gandhi Over Remarks Against PM Modi
  • Tripura HC Reverses Cheque Bounce Acquittal: Mere Doubt Over Lender’s Financial Capacity Cannot Save Accused
  • Section 43 vs Section 42 of NDPS Act: Tripura HC Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case
  • Tripura HC Case Raises Questions Over Non-Deposit of Employees’ EPF and ESI Contributions
  • Bengal Voters Move Supreme Court Against SIR After Names Deleted From Electoral Rolls

Archives

  • October 2026 (17)
  • September 2026 (29)
  • August 2026 (5)

Contact Us

chiefeditor@pleadandprejudice.com

Copyright 2026 — PLEAD & PREJUDICE. All rights reserved.