Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
  • Face book
  • Instagram
PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE

Beyond the Brief

PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE

Beyond the Brief

  • Home
  • Supreme Court Today
  • High Courts Today
  • Judiciary Mock-Test
  • AIBE Exam Mock Test
  • Editor Coloumn

About This Site

This may be a good place to introduce yourself and your site or include some credits.

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against SSC Aspirant, Says Mere Presence at Protest Is Not Enough for Prosecution
  • Tripura High Court Dismisses Manik Sarkar’s Plea to Quash FIR Over ‘Jongi Andolon’ Remark, Directs Him to Avoid Provocative Speeches
  • Supreme Court Stays Criminal Defamation Trial Against Rahul Gandhi Over Remarks Against PM Modi
  • Tripura HC Reverses Cheque Bounce Acquittal: Mere Doubt Over Lender’s Financial Capacity Cannot Save Accused
  • Section 43 vs Section 42 of NDPS Act: Tripura HC Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Find Us

Address
123 Main Street
New York, NY 10001

Hours
Monday–Friday: 9:00AM–5:00PM
Saturday & Sunday: 11:00AM–3:00PM

  • Home
  • Supreme Court Today
  • High Courts Today
  • Judiciary Mock-Test
  • AIBE Exam Mock Test
  • Editor Coloumn
Subscribe
Close

Search

hcs today

Tripura HC: CCL Requests Must Be Properly Considered; 365 Days Granted to Teacher

August 28, 2026 1 Min Read
0

The Tripura High Court has held that Child Care Leave (CCL) cannot be claimed as an absolute right, but authorities cannot mechanically reject or ignore a genuine request for such leave.Justice Biswajit Palit, in Smt. Tapasi Roy v. State of Tripura & Ors., WP(C) No. 597 of 2025, directed the State authorities to grant 365 days of CCL to a woman Post Graduate Teacher.The petitioner had sought leave to care for her minor son, who was studying in New Delhi and preparing for his Class X Board Examination. The record also indicated that the child was suffering from a breathing-related ailment requiring medical care.The Court examined Rule 39(C) of the Tripura State Civil Service (Leave) Rules, 1986, which permits a woman Government servant with minor children to avail CCL up to 730 days during her entire service, subject to sanction by the competent authority.While acknowledging that CCL is not an unconditional statutory entitlement, the Court emphasised that the competent authority must meaningfully consider the circumstances and necessity behind the request. In the present case, the authorities had failed to provide any cogent or justifiable reason for not properly considering the petitioner’s representation.The Court accordingly allowed the writ petition and directed the respondents to grant 365 days of CCL within one month from the date of judgment.Key TakeawayCCL may require prior sanction, but administrative discretion must be exercised fairly, judiciously and after considering the genuine circumstances necessitating the leave.

Author

Plead and Prejudice Network

Follow Me
Other Articles
Previous

Supreme Court Issues 10-Point Framework to Speed Up Dowry-Related Trials

Next

Tripura HC Grants Relief to Nine T-TET Aspirants, Orders Revision of Marks

No Comment! Be the first one.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For more information

Stay updated with the latest legal news, judgments, and court developments. Follow us on social media for regular updates. Plead & Prejudice — Beyond the Brief.

Search

Contact Us

Have a legal news tip, query, or feedback? Email us or send us a DM on our social media platforms. We’d be happy to hear from you.

About This Site

Plead & Prejudice brings you concise and timely updates on Indian courts, judgments, and legal developments.

Beyond the Brief.

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against SSC Aspirant, Says Mere Presence at Protest Is Not Enough for Prosecution
  • Tripura High Court Dismisses Manik Sarkar’s Plea to Quash FIR Over ‘Jongi Andolon’ Remark, Directs Him to Avoid Provocative Speeches
  • Supreme Court Stays Criminal Defamation Trial Against Rahul Gandhi Over Remarks Against PM Modi
  • Tripura HC Reverses Cheque Bounce Acquittal: Mere Doubt Over Lender’s Financial Capacity Cannot Save Accused
  • Section 43 vs Section 42 of NDPS Act: Tripura HC Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case

Archives

  • October 2026 (19)
  • September 2026 (29)
  • August 2026 (5)

Contact Us

chiefeditor@pleadandprejudice.com

Copyright 2026 — PLEAD & PREJUDICE. All rights reserved.