Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
  • Face book
  • Instagram
PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE

Beyond the Brief

PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE PLEAD & PREJUDICE

Beyond the Brief

  • Home
  • Supreme Court Today
  • High Courts Today
  • Judiciary Mock-Test
  • AIBE Exam Mock Test
  • Editor Coloumn

About This Site

This may be a good place to introduce yourself and your site or include some credits.

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against SSC Aspirant, Says Mere Presence at Protest Is Not Enough for Prosecution
  • Tripura High Court Dismisses Manik Sarkar’s Plea to Quash FIR Over ‘Jongi Andolon’ Remark, Directs Him to Avoid Provocative Speeches
  • Supreme Court Stays Criminal Defamation Trial Against Rahul Gandhi Over Remarks Against PM Modi
  • Tripura HC Reverses Cheque Bounce Acquittal: Mere Doubt Over Lender’s Financial Capacity Cannot Save Accused
  • Section 43 vs Section 42 of NDPS Act: Tripura HC Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Find Us

Address
123 Main Street
New York, NY 10001

Hours
Monday–Friday: 9:00AM–5:00PM
Saturday & Sunday: 11:00AM–3:00PM

  • Home
  • Supreme Court Today
  • High Courts Today
  • Judiciary Mock-Test
  • AIBE Exam Mock Test
  • Editor Coloumn
Subscribe
Close

Search

hcs today

Tripura HC Grants Relief to Nine T-TET Aspirants, Orders Revision of Marks

August 30, 2026 2 Min Read
0

The Tripura High Court has granted relief to nine candidates who appeared in the T-TET 2024 Paper-I examination, directing the concerned authorities to add one mark to the score of each petitioner.The order was passed by Justice Biswajit Palit while deciding a writ petition filed by the candidates, who had challenged the treatment of a particular question in the final answer key.The controversy centred on a question concerning the “Anarchic Theory of Intelligence”.

According to the petitioners, the answer they selected had been accepted as correct when the same question appeared in the T-TET examination conducted in 2022. However, a different answer was treated as correct in the 2024 examination.The candidates argued that this change in the answer key had cost each of them one crucial mark, leaving them short of the qualifying marks required in their respective categories.The State opposed the petition, pointing out that the candidates had not raised objections during the period provided for challenging the provisional answer key. The authorities also relied upon the opinion of an expert committee, which had supported the answer reflected in the final key.The High Court, however, found that the authorities had not adequately demonstrated the basis on which the expert committee had reached its conclusion. The Court also took note of the fact that the answer chosen by the petitioners had previously been accepted for the same question in the 2022 T-TET examination.In the absence of a satisfactory explanation for the change in approach, the Court held that the petitioners were entitled to the additional mark. The authorities have been directed to revise the marks of all nine petitioners within two months and declare their results thereafter in accordance with the Court’s directions.

Author

Plead and Prejudice Network

Follow Me
Other Articles
Previous

Tripura HC: CCL Requests Must Be Properly Considered; 365 Days Granted to Teacher

Next

Tripura High Court Sets September Deadline for State to Act on Open Prison Infrastructure

No Comment! Be the first one.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For more information

Stay updated with the latest legal news, judgments, and court developments. Follow us on social media for regular updates. Plead & Prejudice — Beyond the Brief.

Search

Contact Us

Have a legal news tip, query, or feedback? Email us or send us a DM on our social media platforms. We’d be happy to hear from you.

About This Site

Plead & Prejudice brings you concise and timely updates on Indian courts, judgments, and legal developments.

Beyond the Brief.

Recent Posts

  • Delhi High Court Quashes FIR Against SSC Aspirant, Says Mere Presence at Protest Is Not Enough for Prosecution
  • Tripura High Court Dismisses Manik Sarkar’s Plea to Quash FIR Over ‘Jongi Andolon’ Remark, Directs Him to Avoid Provocative Speeches
  • Supreme Court Stays Criminal Defamation Trial Against Rahul Gandhi Over Remarks Against PM Modi
  • Tripura HC Reverses Cheque Bounce Acquittal: Mere Doubt Over Lender’s Financial Capacity Cannot Save Accused
  • Section 43 vs Section 42 of NDPS Act: Tripura HC Upholds Conviction in NDPS Case

Archives

  • October 2026 (19)
  • September 2026 (29)
  • August 2026 (5)

Contact Us

chiefeditor@pleadandprejudice.com

Copyright 2026 — PLEAD & PREJUDICE. All rights reserved.